The Original CZ Forum
CZ PISTOL CLUBS => CZ Polymer Pistols: P10, P-07, P-09 => Topic started by: BCC on January 07, 2019, 06:53:01 PM
-
Can anyone give some pros/cons of both these triggers for the P10C ?? I see the Cajun 10100 is adjustable for pre-travel and they show another trigger but I don't see any difference in the two ?? Any insight is appreciated....
-
Been wondering about that also..... Anyone tried or have both? I handled the HBI trigger on a CZC setup and liked it a lot. Planning on swapping out the original once I get some extended trigger time with the stock unit.
-
I just ordered the Cajun mostly because it is curved versus the hbi being straight. Both are reportedly excellent.
-
The Cajun trigger can be adjusted to have less pre-travel. I tried the gen1 Cajun trigger and ended up going with the HBI because I like the flat profile. The gen2 Cajun trigger looks promising though, and it's made of G10 instead of metal. If I buy another P10, I plan to try it out.
-
I have the HBI and it's hard to imagine anything being any better. After about 450 rounds and 2K dry fires I'm averaging 3.4lb trigger pull. I know the shoe has little to do with that but I love the flat face.
-
I have two P-10Cs and have the HBI trigger installed on one and the CGW trigger installed on the other.
Pros and Cons in my opinion.
HbI: Pro. Flat faced trigger that I really like. I have flat faced triggers on my CZ 75 SA Shadow and SP-01 SAO conversion.
Con. Not adjustable but take-up has been reduced.
CGW: Pro. Adjustable for take-up
Con. Not flat faced.
They are both very good triggers. I think it depends on what is more important to you. If taking out almost all of the take-up is the priority then the CGW is your trigger. If you like a wide flat faced trigger and can live with a little take-up, then the HBI is your trigger. For me, the flat faced trigger overrides eliminating the take-up.
-
You guys make some good points for both triggers....Thanks for responding