Thats not quite what I was asking but I think I answered my question if I read correctly in another thread about it having short chamber. Question is this just Buffalo Bore or could I reasonably expect the of any +p and +p+ ammo?
I think you and Mr.Buffalo both are fairly-well off the mark.
First off, you make it sound like there is only one FMJ shape, but there are dozens. The CZ chamber is cut for FMJ because that's all you can legally buy in Europe. Then you get to the USA and we have flat nose round nose, conical, flat nose conical, FMJ and a couple of weird things seen only on YouTube that the Europeans never dreamed of. American chambers (like Ruger) are cut for these with generous freebore because they want to be able to shoot anything safely.
(https://i.imgur.com/WI0EkTtl.jpg)
Please don't tell me these are the same shape, or that they will fit a chamber the same way
(https://i.imgur.com/N951Yn5l.png)
Please don't tell me all bullets "chamber push" to the same length
Then you make it sound like the length of the freebore is set by some fixed standard. SAAMI sets the voluntary standards for ammo and pistol chambers sold in the USA. If you look it up (HERE (https://saami.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/ANSI-SAAMI-Z299.3-CFP-and-R-Approved-2015-12-14-Posting-Copy.pdf)), there is no fixed dimension on freebore. Their only concern is headspacing.
What you need to know and be concerned about with your CZ is all covered in out Ammo & Handloading forum stickies. We have 2 sections; one for factory ammo and one for reloading ammo. Reading these will help you understand why no 2 barrels are alike and no 2 pieces of ammo are alike. When you multiply hundreds of ammo shapes by thousands of chamber shapes you get an almost limitless list of possibilities for "ammo fit".
There is no single standard for the world. That's the root issue here. But how can there be ? One standard can't cover precision "Olympic-grade" target pistols AND throw-into-the-mud military grade pistols.
Hope this helps.
Thats not quite what I was asking but I think I answered my question if I read correctly in another thread about it having short chamber. Question is this just Buffalo Bore or could I reasonably expect the of any +p and +p+ ammo?
I think you and Mr.Buffalo both are fairly-well off the mark.
First off, you make it sound like there is only one FMJ shape, but there are dozens. The CZ chamber is cut for FMJ because that's all you can legally buy in Europe. Then you get to the USA and we have flat nose round nose, conical, flat nose conical, FMJ and a couple of weird things seen only on YouTube that the Europeans never dreamed of. American chambers (like Ruger) are cut for these with generous freebore because they want to be able to shoot anything safely.
(https://i.imgur.com/WI0EkTtl.jpg)
Please don't tell me these are the same shape, or that they will fit a chamber the same way
(https://i.imgur.com/N951Yn5l.png)
Please don't tell me all bullets "chamber push" to the same length
Then you make it sound like the length of the freebore is set by some fixed standard. SAAMI sets the voluntary standards for ammo and pistol chambers sold in the USA. If you look it up (HERE (https://saami.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/ANSI-SAAMI-Z299.3-CFP-and-R-Approved-2015-12-14-Posting-Copy.pdf)), there is no fixed dimension on freebore. Their only concern is headspacing.
What you need to know and be concerned about with your CZ is all covered in out Ammo & Handloading forum stickies. We have 2 sections; one for factory ammo and one for reloading ammo. Reading these will help you understand why no 2 barrels are alike and no 2 pieces of ammo are alike. When you multiply hundreds of ammo shapes by thousands of chamber shapes you get an almost limitless list of possibilities for "ammo fit".
There is no single standard for the world. That's the root issue here. But how can there be ? One standard can't cover precision "Olympic-grade" target pistols AND throw-into-the-mud military grade pistols.
Hope this helps.
Thank you, aas not really interested in handloading just needed confirmation that in general +P was not going to be an issue so while informative was a bit more than I needed.