The Original CZ Forum
CZ PISTOL CLUBS => CZ Polymer Pistols: P10, P-07, P-09 => Topic started by: MississippiCelery on May 12, 2018, 11:45:39 PM
-
New to me at least. Just saw this video, appears to have been uploaded very recently.
https://youtu.be/CN-DbZWZAQQ
Thoughts?
-
New to me at least. Just saw this video, appears to have been uploaded very recently.
https://youtu.be/CN-DbZWZAQQ
Thoughts?
I love internet gunsmiths and sleuths.
First off my 3 won?t do that, and how are we supposed to know if hammer hands here has reassembled the striker block properly.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
;D Not sure what the point was when manually manipulating the striker because in fully assembled P10 or Glock pistol, the striker is always at partial rest and not fully cocked.
-
There's no issue here. This guy is clearly a 5 star idiot!
-
No point here, and he was talking so fast I couldn't understand a word he was saying!!!! 8)
-
I don't think he was talking english, sounded like one of the eastern european countries. Total non issue .
-
I know it wasn't English, my attempt at humor. :-[
-
Sorry my bad.
-
His attempt at humor wasn't English?
-
I thought mine was the only one! when my striker block is in the "safe" position all I have to do to defeat it is lightly nudge it with my finger and it pops right out of the way! It honestly seems like a poor design compared to the more common plunger-style striker blocks. Ever since I found this out I've been too afraid to keep it chambered. My P10C was manufactured late 2017 if that helps.
-
I thought mine was the only one! when my striker block is in the "safe" position all I have to do to defeat it is lightly nudge it with my finger and it pops right out of the way! It honestly seems like a poor design compared to the more common plunger-style striker blocks. Ever since I found this out I've been too afraid to keep it chambered. My P10C was manufactured late 2017 if that helps.
Honestly this is how ignorant nonsense gets started and grows into internet lore. The guy that made this video is an abject moron and there is not defect in the system. When the gun is fully assembled and chambered with the slide in battery position you are not going to make it fire unless you pull the trigger. Nothing wrong with the guns in this regard.
-
I thought mine was the only one! when my striker block is in the "safe" position all I have to do to defeat it is lightly nudge it with my finger and it pops right out of the way! It honestly seems like a poor design compared to the more common plunger-style striker blocks. Ever since I found this out I've been too afraid to keep it chambered. My P10C was manufactured late 2017 if that helps.
Honestly this is how ignorant nonsense gets started and grows into internet lore. The guy that made this video is an abject moron and there is not defect in the system. When the gun is fully assembled and chambered with the slide in battery position you are not going to make it fire unless you pull the trigger. Nothing wrong with the guns in this regard.
Ideally, a striker block safety would be unnecessary on any gun if they only fired when the trigger was pulled. I'm using an excerpt from the Glock user manual, but since it's a function check it applies to nearly all striker fired handguns. Following the instructions specified I can defeat my striker block safety about 50% of the time. That's 50% more than I am comfortable with.
https://imgur.com/a/z0truQy
-
If you think you have an issue call CZ-USA and see what they say. No one else seems to feel there's a problem but you and the guy in the video.
-
If you think you have an issue call CZ-USA and see what they say. No one else seems to feel there's a problem but you and the guy in the video.
That's the plan as soon as I can scrape together the money to ship it back. I was mostly just wondering if any other owners were having this problem or I just got a fluke. Glad to hear yours is working well though!
-
If you think you have an issue call CZ-USA and see what they say. No one else seems to feel there's a problem but you and the guy in the video.
That's the plan as soon as I can scrape together the money to ship it back. I was mostly just wondering if any other owners were having this problem or I just got a fluke. Glad to hear yours is working well though!
I never said I owned one. I've inspected many P10C's at the local range and find them to be just fine if striker fired pistols are your thing. You don't have to scrape money together to ship it back,it should still be under warranty. CZ will email you a shipping label to send it back on their dime.
-
I never said I owned one and you don't have to scrape money together to ship it back,it should still be under warranty. CZ will email you a shipping label to send it back on their dime.
Really? I didn't know that. Thank you.
-
Ideally, a striker block safety would be unnecessary on any gun if they only fired when the trigger was pulled. I'm using an excerpt from the Glock user manual, but since it's a function check it applies to nearly all striker fired handguns. Following the instructions specified I can defeat my striker block safety about 50% of the time. That's 50% more than I am comfortable with.
https://imgur.com/a/z0truQy
But you are using a safety check and picture of a Glock striker that operates completely different from the P10C. The back of the trigger bar on the P10C just in front of the sear holds the striker safety in position until the trigger is pulled on the P10C. Just like the VP9 swings the striker safety out of the way. Both CZ and HK have decided to go away from the post/plunger safety system I'm assuming to improve the trigger pull. Just because you can defeat the safety with the pistol field stripped doesn't mean anything is wrong with the system. You just aren't comfortable with a safety system that you are not familiar with. That is fine just buy a Glock or a M&P and move on. Sending your P10C back to CZ is not going to change the design of the safety. David
-
But you are using a safety check and picture of a Glock striker that operates completely different from the P10C. The back of the trigger bar on the P10C just in front of the sear holds the striker safety in position until the trigger is pulled on the P10C. Just like the VP9 swings the striker safety out of the way. Both CZ and HK have decided to go away from the post/plunger safety system I'm assuming to improve the trigger pull. Just because you can defeat the safety with the pistol field stripped doesn't mean anything is wrong with the system. You just aren't comfortable with a safety system that you are not familiar with. That is fine just buy a Glock or a M&P and move on. Sending your P10C back to CZ is not going to change the design of the safety. David
I see the part of the trigger bar you are talking about but I don't see how it holds the safety in place. with the trigger in the cocked position it sits in front of the safety and doesn't make contact until the trigger is squeezed and the ramped face pushes it out of the safe position.
https://imgur.com/a/Napf1Cd
-
The back edge is making contact is how I?ve seen it demonstrated. Also the striker is just sitting in a neutral position when the slide is off the frame. Remember the striker is pulled back under tension sitting in a cocked position on the ledge of the sear when the slide is on and cycled. It is held back passed the red arrow in your picture. There is a lot of things going on that engineering designs in that we don?t see with the gun all together in battery. In the end though if you are not confident in the system there are tons of other good options out there. David
-
I have a P 10 with close to 4000 rounds threw it and have not had one problem that other people on you tube seem to find not one.
My serial # starts with a 1 so its an earlier issued one. Some people have had some issues with breaking strikers but thats an easy
fix. It is one of the most reliable and accurate hand guns i own.
-
Again, Glock and CZ strikers are at rest until you pull the trigger. Doesn't matter if there is a striker block safety.