The Original CZ Forum

CZ PISTOL CLUBS => CZ 2075 RAMI CLUB => Topic started by: WVSurveyor on March 20, 2018, 12:06:09 PM

Title: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: WVSurveyor on March 20, 2018, 12:06:09 PM
Anyone have experience with these two? I currently rotate CC between
my G43 and HK VP9SK. Looking for another CC weapon. The revised version
of the P365 with the xray sights is very intriguing. I really like my CZ's. Have
a SP-01 Tactical, a Scorpion carbine and a 512 .22mag. All very sweet!
That makes the Rami also very intriguing. It is 10 oz heavier and a 1/4" wider.
Just wanted some feedback from people who have handled and shot both.

Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: volbagman on March 20, 2018, 12:18:44 PM
I cannot speak to the sig, but I carried a Rami for about a year. IWB, 4'oclock in an Aliengear cloak tuck. Recently my back has been hurting so I parked the Rami and went back to the old reliable S&W M&P 340 in a Mika pocket holster. only 5 rounds of 357 mag, but my back sure feels better
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: ccssid on March 20, 2018, 01:41:09 PM
I carry my Rami aiwb at 12:30 in a kydex or owb in Desantis speed scabbard at 4:00....both very comfortable and never any issues. FWIW:  I am not a big guy, 5'8" and 155# . But I do alternate with an m&p shield which is , of course, a bit more unintrusive do to its much smaller size.

Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: mecenas on March 20, 2018, 03:01:32 PM
I am sorry, but I can't help noticing how every response to the original inquiry thus far misses the mark.
Don't you read the post first ?
VWSurveyor is looking for the input from those who handled and shot both firearms
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: MeatAxe on March 20, 2018, 04:14:09 PM
I am sorry, but I can't help noticing how every response to the original inquiry thus far misses the mark.
Don't you read the post first ?
VWSurveyor is looking for the input from those who handled and shot both firearms


Since most people here are CZ owners, and are therefore among the upper echelon of firearms owners, few have volunteered to pay several hundred dollars to be one of SIG's thousands of beta testers.

The news on the P365 is not good:

http://sigtalk.com/p250-p320-p365-p320-x-5-pistols/271490-sig-tweaking-p365-design.html

If you really want a P365 (or any other new SIG), you'd do well to wait a year or two for SIG to sort out all the bugs -- or cease production, as the case may be (e.g. the similar p250, 290, 520, etc.).

These are not your father's West German and early Exeter SIGs...
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: WVSurveyor on March 20, 2018, 05:26:11 PM
I never said I really wanted the Sig, just that it intrigued me. I wanted to see
if anyone has shot the Rami and the P365 so they could give me an honest
evaluation. Maybe they rented one at the range.
Maybe a friend has one they've tried. Many different scenarios of how
one may get their hands on one without shelling out the coin to purchase.
Sig has made some tweaks on the original design that reportedly fixed
the battery problem. I can probably get my hands on a P365 in the near
future and see how I like it. The Rami, on the other hand, is a little harder
to come by.
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: Obiwan on March 20, 2018, 10:57:57 PM
Since most people here are CZ owners, and are therefore among the upper echelon of firearms owners, few have volunteered to pay several hundred dollars to be one of SIG's thousands of beta testers.

I think that very much depends on the model. While I'm a CZ fan boy, I really really like my Sig P238. Can't go wrong with a mini 1911 platform. Truth be told, I'm carrying it more often than a CZ, due to the size (single-stacked .380). I got the HD model (all stainless). But while small, I think it feels heavier than a loaded PCR. I say feels since the scale says otherwise. :)

Anyway, not all Sigs are rubbish. They do make a few good ones. :)
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: MeatAxe on March 21, 2018, 12:04:09 AM
Since most people here are CZ owners, and are therefore among the upper echelon of firearms owners, few have volunteered to pay several hundred dollars to be one of SIG's thousands of beta testers.

I think that very much depends on the model. While I'm a CZ fan boy, I really really like my Sig P238. Can't go wrong with a mini 1911 platform. Truth be told, I'm carrying it more often than a CZ, due to the size (single-stacked .380). I got the HD model (all stainless). But while small, I think it feels heavier than a loaded PCR. I say feels since the scale says otherwise. :)

Anyway, not all Sigs are rubbish. They do make a few good ones. :)


The P238 / P938 certainly had their share of problems when they were first launched, that took a couple of years to sort out. So, Caveat Emptor, especially on new SIG models, though I've had my share of QC issues on established models in recent years as well.

Also, SIG's automatic response to their own qc and design / mfg. issues is "shooter error," which tends to rub people the wrong way.
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: SP01bob on March 31, 2018, 06:44:01 PM
For me size matters, but round count matters more. Give me RAMI, with a decocker and 14 +1 any day over the Sig.

Btw, I love my lil P 238 as well. Best lil pocket pistol, even to the point of thinking about getting a P 938. I love CZs, so there you go.

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: nickshawn on April 06, 2018, 12:29:55 PM
Headed to the range with my 365 in a few minutes and will report back. Shot 50 rounds through it Tuesday with no issues. I can tell you this, it's much smaller in hand than my Rami (obviously).

Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: nickshawn on April 06, 2018, 02:02:51 PM
I am sorry, but I can't help noticing how every response to the original inquiry thus far misses the mark.
Don't you read the post first ?
VWSurveyor is looking for the input from those who handled and shot both firearms


Since most people here are CZ owners, and are therefore among the upper echelon of firearms owners, few have volunteered to pay several hundred dollars to be one of SIG's thousands of beta testers.

The news on the P365 is not good:

http://sigtalk.com/p250-p320-p365-p320-x-5-pistols/271490-sig-tweaking-p365-design.html

If you really want a P365 (or any other new SIG), you'd do well to wait a year or two for SIG to sort out all the bugs -- or cease production, as the case may be (e.g. the similar p250, 290, 520, etc.).

These are not your father's West German and early Exeter SIGs...

My P10c worked great right out of the box.... Oh nevermind I thought you were talking about CZ's latest flawless launch....  ::)


OP - Back on topic. Side by side the Rami dwarfs the 365, even more than what the numbers tell. I'll just do some quick bullets on my thoughts comparing the two

365 - smaller, lighter, easier to conceal. 150 rounds so far without a single issue. The X-ray sights are better. Same number of rounds with flush fit mags. Accuracy was fine for the size gun. Pointed well, recoil was manageable although as you would expect higher than the Rami

Rami - smoother shooting, the extra weight really shows here. Trigger is better in SA, again as you would expect. Rami wins in the accuracy department, but not by much.

If you said I could keep only one it would be the P365, just because it's better suited for the purpose of "deep conceal" carry. As much as the Rami is a great gun it's a chubby, heavy little joker.

There you go, my .02.

Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: nickshawn on April 06, 2018, 02:12:47 PM
Last 15 or so rounds at 5 yards

. (https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180406/ef1fc64985a967072cb2b13fcd7286c2.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: mecenas on April 06, 2018, 04:44:59 PM
No argument here about the size, but looking at your target at 5 yards - was your POA at 8 o"clock ?

The reason I ask is that with a point of aim at dead center, at 5 yards you should be close to X and your average POI is around 8 o'clock and that is not a very good accuracy at such a short distance.
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: SP01bob on April 06, 2018, 05:33:41 PM
No argument here about the size, but looking at your target at 5 yards - was your POA at 8 o"clock ?

The reason I ask is that with a point of aim at dead center, at 5 yards you should be close to X and your average POI is around 8 o'clock and that is not a very good accuracy at such a short distance.
I see that often at the range, not the gun but the grip, trigger control, ie, the shooter.

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: nickshawn on April 06, 2018, 08:09:25 PM
No argument here about the size, but looking at your target at 5 yards - was your POA at 8 o"clock ?

The reason I ask is that with a point of aim at dead center, at 5 yards you should be close to X and your average POI is around 8 o'clock and that is not a very good accuracy at such a short distance.
I see that often at the range, not the gun but the grip, trigger control, ie, the shooter.

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Yep, that is all me. Still getting used to the feel, plus was switching back and forth between the 365 and my new P320X VTAC.  The low left ones were the first few ones on that target, the ones closer to the middle were me slowing down a bit and focusing on trigger pull.

A Rami target would have looked very similar  ;D
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: SP01bob on April 06, 2018, 09:29:05 PM
No argument here about the size, but looking at your target at 5 yards - was your POA at 8 o"clock ?

The reason I ask is that with a point of aim at dead center, at 5 yards you should be close to X and your average POI is around 8 o'clock and that is not a very good accuracy at such a short distance.
I see that often at the range, not the gun but the grip, trigger control, ie, the shooter.

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Yep, that is all me. Still getting used to the feel, plus was switching back and forth between the 365 and my new P320X VTAC.  The low left ones were the first few ones on that target, the ones closer to the middle were me slowing down a bit and focusing on trigger pull.

A Rami target would have looked very similar  ;D
I hear ya. I've been learning and working on both my grip and trigger pull. I seem to pull left if I'm shooting fast from the draw, so I was speaking from my own experience, not to sound critical.

What was interesting about your target was the the apparent wall you set up on the right side of your target.

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: dannyvi on April 06, 2018, 09:39:37 PM
Got to get me the Sig! God, cant find any where i am! Great as the Rami is, it is bulky! I appendix carry!
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: nickshawn on April 06, 2018, 09:56:12 PM
Got to get me the Sig! God, cant find any where i am! Great as the Rami is, it is bulky! I appendix carry!

They are starting to pop up in lots of places. Tooleshootingsupply has one as of 15 minutes ago....

SP01bob -  ;D ;D  I was saving the right side for later  8)
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: MeatAxe on April 07, 2018, 01:23:42 AM
I am sorry, but I can't help noticing how every response to the original inquiry thus far misses the mark.
Don't you read the post first ?
VWSurveyor is looking for the input from those who handled and shot both firearms


Since most people here are CZ owners, and are therefore among the upper echelon of firearms owners, few have volunteered to pay several hundred dollars to be one of SIG's thousands of beta testers.

The news on the P365 is not good:

http://sigtalk.com/p250-p320-p365-p320-x-5-pistols/271490-sig-tweaking-p365-design.html

If you really want a P365 (or any other new SIG), you'd do well to wait a year or two for SIG to sort out all the bugs -- or cease production, as the case may be (e.g. the similar p250, 290, 520, etc.).

These are not your father's West German and early Exeter SIGs...

My P10c worked great right out of the box.... Oh nevermind I thought you were talking about CZ's latest flawless launch....  ::)


OP - Back on topic. Side by side the Rami dwarfs the 365, even more than what the numbers tell. I'll just do some quick bullets on my thoughts comparing the two

365 - smaller, lighter, easier to conceal. 150 rounds so far without a single issue. The X-ray sights are better. Same number of rounds with flush fit mags. Accuracy was fine for the size gun. Pointed well, recoil was manageable although as you would expect higher than the Rami

Rami - smoother shooting, the extra weight really shows here. Trigger is better in SA, again as you would expect. Rami wins in the accuracy department, but not by much.

If you said I could keep only one it would be the P365, just because it's better suited for the purpose of "deep conceal" carry. As much as the Rami is a great gun it's a chubby, heavy little joker.

There you go, my .02.


I was never in favor of CZ's foray into the Glocktard fad, then again, I haven't heard anything about the P10 beating itself to death. Only possible discharges when dropped, same as the Sig P320. Has the P365 passed the drop test?

To each his own, I guess. Personally, I wouldn't want to rush in and pay to be the first Sig P365 beta tester on my block. If I wanted one, I'd give Sig a year or two to sort out the bugs. Then again, they've had a few models recently discontinued that they did not sort the bugs out of...there may be more bugs to rear their ugly heads on the P365 as people pile up the rounds. Then, there's the often spotty Sig USA quality control and customer service.

Of course, then there's the monumental CZ75 in all its iterations: often copied, maybe outnumbered, but never outclassed!



Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: nickshawn on April 11, 2018, 05:07:15 PM
Got to get me the Sig! God, cant find any where i am! Great as the Rami is, it is bulky! I appendix carry!

They are starting to pop up in lots of places. Tooleshootingsupply has one as of 15 minutes ago....

SP01bob -  ;D ;D  I was saving the right side for later  8)

Not great but getting better.

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180411/cd4b954c5e247c9410cf35b82740ae0f.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: dannyvi on April 11, 2018, 11:57:32 PM
Saw one st a gunshop but already on hold ! Cant believe how dmall the grips were and hold 10 rounds.This should be a beginning of a norm ! Still looking!
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: SP01bob on April 12, 2018, 12:22:10 AM
Got to get me the Sig! God, cant find any where i am! Great as the Rami is, it is bulky! I appendix carry!

They are starting to pop up in lots of places. Tooleshootingsupply has one as of 15 minutes ago....

SP01bob -  ;D ;D  I was saving the right side for later  8)

Not great but getting better.

(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180411/cd4b954c5e247c9410cf35b82740ae0f.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Its funny how we do what we do. I have a habit of hitting low left on the first shot in DA, almost every time. Fixing that has become my main objective as of last weekend.

Hey in your case, you can flip the target and get twice the practice.

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: nickshawn on April 12, 2018, 10:24:59 AM
 ;D ;D

I'm ahead of my time, "target conservation" is my new theme. Same number of shots but only using half the targets!

Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: TimJupiterFla on April 23, 2018, 07:09:15 PM
TRY BEFORE YOU BUY!!

I tried the P365 at a local range. I ran 115, 124 147 grain. It was a good shooter but rather snappy. THEN I picked up my RAMI OH!!! what a difference! The grip being a little thicker and the added weight made the next few rounds such a pleasure. I found myself getting back on target much faster.
The best comparison to the Sig 365 was my Ruger LC9s Pro. They are almost Identical in size. The Sig has just a little better reset. I have a 9 round mags for my LC9s.
I SOOooo wanted the Sig to be my next gun, but between the two I already own I didn't see the need.
So the 600 dollars I put aside for the Sig is now going for a Scorpion EVO 3 with flashcan.
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: MattyD380 on April 24, 2018, 11:05:53 AM
There's no magic in 10 rounds.

But... give me a concealable gun that puts rounds on target effortlessly, with minimal recoil, durability and reliability... that's magic. And I doubt the P365 delivers on all those intangibles, when it comes to shooting and running the gun (though, in fairness, I've never shot a P365). The RAMI is as solid, stable and accurate as any gun I own... just a lot smaller. Even if it isn't quite as small as a P365.
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: dannyvi on April 24, 2018, 05:59:52 PM
Sizewise not really much difference ,just the thickness ! Maybe CZ can make the Rami a bit thinner? I doubt if I'll get the Sig.
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: GBUS on April 24, 2018, 06:58:13 PM
The G43 is as small a gun as I want in 9mm and I have no interest in the Sig even with the 4 extra rounds and I'll take the 2075 over either as I prefer metal to plastic any day.

Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: regalka on April 26, 2018, 09:24:32 AM
Good morning,
I've got both a SIG P365 and a Rami B. 

The 365 is the "newer" version, which supposedly, corrected the early problems the weapon became noted for.  It's well made, easy to conceal and carries the minimum (for me) number of rounds (10 in the flush fit magazine).  For the first 500-rounds, the 365 performed flawlessly.  Between rounds 500-800, the 365 had 2 failures to extract (FTE). Between 800-1600, another 2 FTE.  Between 1600-1900, another 3 FTE, for a total of 7 of the exact same problem. At that time, after speaking with the SIG customer service staff, I returned the 365 to SIG.  They replaced the recoil spring assembly, extractor, extractor spring and extractor pin.  Precisely 8-days later (a very quick turnaround), I received the 365. So far, after 200-rounds, I've had 2 FTE - same problem.  I'll give it a few hundred more rounds before again consulting with SIG...

The Rami B is only a week old with 200-rounds fired and one failure to fully return to battery.  I think that may be part of the break-in period.  I love the feel (weight, heft and grip position) of the Rami and I'm slightly more accurate with it compared to the 365.  The "felt recoil" of the Rami is noticeably less than the 365 primarily due to it being a bit heavier for the same magazine capacity (10-rounds), which I don't find objectionable at this point (may change after I carry it for a while).   

If I had to choose only one?  Can't really say.  A recurring problem with the 365 and insufficient experience with the Rami.

I hope this is helpful.  Obviously, YMMV.

Ron
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: Erratikmind on June 05, 2018, 06:47:19 PM
While I am still in the vetting process with my new RAMI BD, I have been carrying my SIG P365 for the past 3 months in a Vedder LightTuck holster.

My P365 has been flawless for some 2,800 rounds. I did change the MIM striker at about 2,400 rounds to a steel striker. It has been the perfect concealed EDC for me. However, the RAMI feels better in my hands. There is also a certain comfort factor carrying in appendix position with a DA/SA firearm.
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: dannyvi on June 11, 2018, 03:14:57 PM
As have been mentioned earlier,  this question was meant to be for whoever had both guns. CZ fans frequent this forum. Just wondering what the replies would be had this been asked in the Sig forum. Myself, i have 4 Ramis ! Shopping for a P356 Sig for now myself. I have handled one and looks perfect for edc! Wish it had a safety!
Title: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: Mercs on June 11, 2018, 08:06:52 PM
As have been mentioned earlier,  this question was meant to be for whoever had both guns. CZ fans frequent this forum. Just wondering what the replies would be had this been asked in the Sig forum. Myself, i have 4 Ramis ! Shopping for a P356 Sig for now myself. I have handled one and looks perfect for edc! Wish it had a safety!
You can wait for the safety version to be released. Not sure when, but it’s coming. I’ll stick with DA/SA only for CCW. Got a nice little 7+1 9mm here, still waiting for CZ to make a single stack Rami
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180612/6a42f9e0f7887feed1712430ecd03a1d.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: dannyvi on June 12, 2018, 02:27:04 AM
Yes, my favorite would still be a DA/SA ccw. Maybe a Sig 365 in DA/SA later?  I would predict more pistols coming in this size and configuration !
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: Erratikmind on June 24, 2018, 07:59:38 PM
Yes, my favorite would still be a DA/SA ccw. Maybe a Sig 365 in DA/SA later?  I would predict more pistols coming in this size and configuration !

With a metal or steel frame would be a winner.
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: Vinny on June 25, 2018, 03:24:02 AM
As have been mentioned earlier,  this question was meant to be for whoever had both guns. CZ fans frequent this forum. Just wondering what the replies would be had this been asked in the Sig forum. Myself, i have 4 Ramis ! Shopping for a P356 Sig for now myself. I have handled one and looks perfect for edc! Wish it had a safety!
You can wait for the safety version to be released. Not sure when, but it’s coming. I’ll stick with DA/SA only for CCW. Got a nice little 7+1 9mm here, still waiting for CZ to make a single stack Rami
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180612/6a42f9e0f7887feed1712430ecd03a1d.jpg)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have both a RAMI BD and a SIG P365. I like them both, but as previously mentioned the RAMI is a bit chubby, and the Sig trigger although very good (for a striker) is a bit light for safe carry without a safety IMHO. I'm sure in time Sig will offer safety models and/or a bit heavier trigger option to meet various State requirements.

I wish that CZ would revisit the RAMI and incorporate what they've learned from the P-07/09/10 polymer guns into a smaller/lighter/thinner 'Ramini-9' with a compact 10 round magazine like the Sig P365.

CZ tried making a 'P' RAMI back in 2006; but unfortunately that was before they learned the design and manufacturing technology that has made the P-07/09 series into the reliable, durable and accurate DA/SA guns they've proven to be.


July 2006

"CZ-USA is pleased to announce the release of the CZ 2075 RAMI P.

The new CZ 2075 RAMI P replaces the aluminum alloy frame of the original RAMI with one of polymer, and lightens the slide to make the new RAMI P even more carry friendly.  The new model also adds more aggressive slide serrations and adjustable sights. The number of internal parts has also been decreased contributing to the reduction in weight and cost without a reduction in reliability.

The CZ 2075 RAMI is a sub-compact semi-automatic based on the proven CZ 75 line of pistols.

The trigger mechanism operates in selective DA and SA mode depending on the shooter’s preferences.  Several safety devices are used including a firing pin block and a manual safety.  Incorporating the CZ double-stack magazine design, the little RAMI accommodates 10 rounds of 9mm plus 1 in the chamber.

With a 3″ barrel, and unloaded weight of less than 23.5 ounces, the polymer frame RAMI is ideal for concealed carry.

The Suggested retail price for the CZ 2075 RAMI P 9mm is $510.00

CZ-USA, P.O.Box 171073, Kansas City, KS 66117-0073
http://www.cz-usa.com
"
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: dannyvi on June 25, 2018, 11:33:20 AM
I have and carry the Rami P with the stainless slide and so far no bulging problems on the polymer receiver. Close to 1000 rounds now as I shoot 50 rounds each time I go to the range . Flat and slim carry as the grip is flatter than the alloyed Rami. Still not as slim as the Sig P365 though. Hoping to get one soon.
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: dannyvi on June 27, 2018, 05:29:21 PM
Just could not say no to a P365! It is way flatter and smaller than my Rami! Feels perfect for carry! Cant say enough for this gun! Now to test it out! Got 3 Ramis but the Rami P feel the closest in grip size. Even using the 12 round mag is not much difference on my appendix.  Sorry, but just can't say enough for this pistol! No, not replacing my Rami...yet!


Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: Mercs on June 27, 2018, 06:02:41 PM
Just could not say no to a P365! It is way flatter and smaller than my Rami! Feels perfect for carry! Cant say enough for this gun! Now to test it out! Got 3 Ramis but the Rami P feel the closest in grip size. Even using the 12 round mag is not much difference on my appendix.  Sorry, but just can't say enough for this pistol! No, not replacing my Rami...yet!
Has it been reliable? That’s the key


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: dannyvi on June 27, 2018, 06:32:44 PM
Absolutely! The main deciding factor! One thing, it's not as pretty as the Rami! I usually feel that after 100 rounds of JHPs should be reliable!
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: Mercs on June 27, 2018, 06:36:08 PM
Absolutely! The main deciding factor! One thing, it's not as pretty as the Rami! I usually feel that after 100 rounds of JHPs should be reliable!
I would run minimum 1k rounds through that gun before carrying it, based on what I’ve read in Sig forum over the last couple months


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: dannyvi on June 27, 2018, 08:56:24 PM
Thanks! Also just sold my P320 subcompact. Been back from recall but never had any problems with that but just not small enough!
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: Shadow2 on December 05, 2018, 11:05:40 AM
Old thread but worth a bump ...

CZ Definitely needs a Rami Re-Boot around a new compact mag ... a SIG 365 sized P10C would be interesting their is just something about the P10C trigger. Modular internals to replace the frame if needed.
Title: Re: 2075 RAMI BD vs. Sig P365
Post by: MeatAxe on December 06, 2018, 10:32:54 PM
Old thread but worth a bump ...

CZ Definitely needs a Rami Re-Boot around a new compact mag ... a SIG 365 sized P10C would be interesting their is just something about the P10C trigger. Modular internals to replace the frame if needed.

As sub-compact version of the P-07 would be interesting. Not a fan of striker pistols.

Of course, the problem with CZ pistols is width as a sub-compact. Hard to get around the width of the frame around slide design that is a major reason for the superiority of CZs over other pistols.