Author Topic: Testing some new 9mm minor powders  (Read 1570 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline wdfwguy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Testing some new 9mm minor powders
« on: September 07, 2020, 11:51:34 PM »
My normal load for the last couple of years has been 124gr coated, and PD 124gr JHP bullets, with Alliant Sport Pistol powder.  Unfortunately, SP is the one thing I wasn't stocked up on, and my last jug isn't running low.  So, I thought this would be a good time to try some new powders.

I started out with my normal SP load, and then loaded rounds with N320, AA #2, Shooters World Clean Shot, and Winchester 244.

Aside from powder, I used Win headstamp brass, Eggleston .356 124gr TC bullets, and Fed SPP, loaded to 1.10 OAL.

I started out with the chrono, just to make sure I had a ~128-130pf load.  My initial results were;

Powder   Charge  Vel   ES   SD

SP - 3.8gr   1050   32   11

N320 - 3.7gr   1052   24   7
N320 - 3.8gr   1064   23   7     

AA #2 - 4.1gr   1032   36   10
AA #2 - 4.2gr   1052   32   9

CS - 4.1gr   1018   35   10
CS - 4.3gr   1045   39   11

244 - 3.6gr   1017   22   7
244 - 3.8gr   1048   12   4         

Offline wdfwguy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: Testing some new 9mm minor powders
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2020, 12:14:28 AM »
I then shot groups using the powder charges that were closest to the velocity I wanted.

For each load, I shot a pair of 8 shot groups at 25 yards, wrists resting on a sandbag.

                           25y groups         Mean radius 
 
CS 4.3gr            2.19"/3.28"         .80"/.82"

AA #2 4.2gr      2.70"/2.57"         .90"/1.09"

N320 3.7gr        3.54"/2.93"         1.32"/1.00

244 3.8gr           2.94"/2.48"         1.10"/.97"

SP 3.8gr             2.55"/2.43"         1.05"/.91"


The group sizes look similar, but the Clean Shot was noticeably more accurate than the others.  And I realize the difference in accuracy is too small to make any difference in a match.  But it was so accurate that it would give me a lot of confidence. 

I'd welcome any comments, or suggestions on improving testing in the future.

Offline Wobbly

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12830
  • Loves the smell of VihtaVuori in the morning !
Re: Testing some new 9mm minor powders
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2020, 04:53:33 PM »
Great info.

Although it did take me awhile to figure what "CS" was. I live in the "Chicken Capital of the World". "CS" means something entirely different here. Spelling things out in the first post might increase your audience attachment and appreciation.

 ;)
In God we trust; On 'Starting Load' we rely.

Offline wdfwguy

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 62
Re: Testing some new 9mm minor powders
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2020, 12:43:28 PM »
Thanks, and I'll keep that in mind the next time I'm referring to chicken sh**, or Clean Shot.

Any suggestions on tweaking my testing procedures?



Great info.

Although it did take me awhile to figure what "CS" was. I live in the "Chicken Capital of the World". "CS" means something entirely different here. Spelling things out in the first post might increase your audience attachment and appreciation.

 ;)

Offline Wobbly

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12830
  • Loves the smell of VihtaVuori in the morning !
Re: Testing some new 9mm minor powders
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2020, 06:30:46 PM »
If you'll use the template we have, then you won't be leaving anything out. I have a passing curiosity about the brass and primers, but that's just me.
In God we trust; On 'Starting Load' we rely.