The 2023 CZUB Catalog is online!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I'm not sure what a barrel press costs, or what a reputable gunsmith would charge for doing this. When I looked into this @11 years ago, it wasn't economical, at all. A major consideration in your situation would be the fact that the proceeds from selling that particular .380, coupled with your current parts, would likely net two nice 82/83 pistols in 9x18mm, or one @#$% of a semi-custom 83 in 9x18mm and some extra money for ammunition. It may or may not be cheaper to buy a "beater" CZ 82 than the parts. According to the relevant statutes/regulations, the frame is the pistol. There is no transfer fee on parts, and the shipping will be considerably cheaper. The parts are out there, if you are patient. Looking at your CZ-83 photo, converting this particular pistol over the difference in the cost of low-end factory ammo would be a bleep shame. There are a lot more .380 loads out there than 9x18mm loads (especially in terms of premium JHP offerings), and there are a lot more appropriate .355" jacketed component bullets available for handloading purposes. The vast majority of .380 cases produced to date are reloadable, you can't say that about 9x18mm. Standardizing on one chambering is highly over-rated, IMHO, especially with a "mil surp" chambering. No one is currently offering new-production pistols in 9x18mm. 9x18 ammunition may be as common as dirt today, but it won't stay that way forever. Historically, "mil surp only" chamberings have proven to be problematic and expensive. I guarantee someone will now post with some sort of rebuttal on how many 9x18mm pistols have been produced. There are a LOT of 9mm Largo pistols out there in decent condition. Do a quick internet search on the ammunition availability today. The Star B was the last generation's PA-63, FWIW.
