For the life of me, I'll never understand CZ's reasoning behind the Shadow 2. Few have ever had any serious complaints about the SP-01 based Shadow. That pistol had been dominating (and still dominates) competitive shooting for several years so, why the need for a Shadow
2?
OK, I think that CZ did it just to take a bite out of EAA/Tanfoglio's marketshare. Tanfoglio built their entire company on ripping-off CZ's designs since the late 1970s and CZ was like, OK let's build a gun that's leaps and bounds better than a Stock 3 and call it...a Shadow 2. When CZ was behind the Iron Curtain during the 1970s and 80's their designs weren't protected by copyright in the West. That's why we see so many CZ clones on the market. Tanfoglio certainly wasn't the only company who made decent copies of CZ's but, it had always been their bread and butter and I swear, I think the Shadow 2 was some 'payback' from CZ.
Don't get me wrong, I love my Shadow 2's. To me, they represent what CZ is capable of mass producing: one of the best production pistols I have ever owned bar none but, sometimes, I look at them and chuckle about the striking resemblance they have to a Stock 3.