I was re-reading Kansas Castle Doctrine statutes this week and found it very interesting. As cited in the article, a person must reasonably believe that use of deadly force is required to prevent imminent death or great bodily harms to oneself or another third person to be justified in the use of deadly force. However, in Kansas statutes, it goes a step further and states that is is "presumed" to have a reasonable belief that deadly force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harms to oneself or another if:
a person is unlawfully or forcefully entering, or has entered and is present within the dwelling, place of work or occupied vehicle of the person using force,
has removed or is attempting to remove another from their dwelling, place of work, or vehicle.
OR if a person knows or has reason to know if any of the above has occurred.
There is no requirement to retreat in Kansas.
In Kansas if you're breaking into someone's car or house, or have already done so, they can shoot you dead and are by law PRESUMED to be reasonably in fear of imminent death or great bodily harm.
In other words, those that train and are trained mentally, physically, emotionally, spiritually, and tactically to be prepared for a life or death situation and therefore aren't actually "scared" like a liberal when threatened, are still fully justified in defending themselves with confidence and authority.
It's right there in black and white...
