AZ_CZ hit the nail on the head and, with a big sledge sledgehammer! Natural point of aim/pointability on target minus sights is something that is either there or it isn't, regardless of who makes the pistol. Some people have it bettter with one or more brands, whereas others don't. It all comes back to you as an individual and what feels and shoots best for you, above all else.
Personally, I generally shoot about the same through all pistols, with a slight nod to a hammer fire for better accuracy. Where I am going with this concerning your question of P-07 vs Glock 19, is that while I shoot Glocks rather well (and I presently have my third one), I cannot stand certain features of a stock Glock 19 (even the Gen 4); stock sights, lack of an appreciable undercut on the trigger guard, cramped finger grooves, and still the annoying lower backstrap hump.
Can I fix them? Of course, but I shouldn't have to undergo major modifications to the pistol to make it work for me, whether I choose to do them myself or send it off to be done professionally incurring further $$$ charges to the original purchase price of said pistol. Money that could be better spent on ammunition for something that works w/o undergoing additional mods to make it into what I want it to be as I carry firearm. Key words there:
WHAT I WANT IT TO BE. And the P-07 gives me that better than any other pistol on the market, right out of the box.
But note that in spite of all I just said, I still like my Glock and will keep it. It's just nowhere near the #1 spot in my EDC rotation, and never will be.
*Disclaimer: I'm an avowed CZ P-07 (and CZ 100) fanboy. My views do not represent the views of the rest of the CZ Forum's members.
[emoji12]
