Author Topic: CZ 452 American vs. CZ 455 American  (Read 221213 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nupes

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 49
Re: CZ 452 American vs. CZ 455 American
« Reply #15 on: February 28, 2011, 10:33:34 PM »
Well, I've worked in tool and die and machining most my life and am very much aware why companies do things the way they do.  I agree with you that in most cases in a  highly competitive market, streamlining, cost cutting and and simplification or outright removal of processes are the motivation for changes.  If the company produces a product that is equal to or better than what preceded it, then the customer also reaps the benefits in a better value product for the money they spend.  I personally think CZ managed this with my rifle at least.  Fit and finish is far better than any of the 452's I've seen. 

The issue with the bolt lug change to a single lug is really a non issue.  The idea is to get enough strength in lock up  to do the job and also center the bolt face recess concentrically with the bore.  This is more reliant on bolt OD vs receiver ID fit than any number of lugs or configuration of lugs in a bolt action. 

I am not sure about the magazine issues if there are any. The 455 has an insert behind the mag that is removed for the longer ammunition and the insert does not interfere with the reliability or feeding of regular LR cartridges.  The key to success with interchangeable barrels designed like the 455's is a very snug slip fit.  I have to give a really good twist and pull on mine to get it out.  This generally means hand fitting and selective matching at the factory.  It is one of the reasons that purchasing the barrels in a fitted set is desirable as opposed to buying separately.  Alternatively CZ could also sell slightly oversized barrels ( a few tenths over) that can be hand fitted by the owner much like many of the better 10/22 barrels out there. 

A fully floated barrel also is not effected by a front sling attachment and is not susceptable to fluctations of accuracy from varying torques on a front lug or pressure on the forestock.  Having a second screw in the action  instead of out front also simplifies proper bedding of the action  and provides a more stable base in the bedding.

In the end, if the average 455 owner can shoot as tight or betted groups as a 452, and have the option of having a different caliber rifle in the same configuration for only $139, the new 455 is a winner.   I'm pretty confident that this will bear out, especially if the other 455's are make as well as mine was.

MarlinXL7

  • Guest
Re: CZ 452 American vs. CZ 455 American
« Reply #16 on: March 05, 2011, 04:09:15 PM »
HotRod9mm, can you tell me who makes those Weaver rails you've got on your CZs and where you got them? They look really nice.

Offline Sheik Yerbouti

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 423
Re: CZ 452 American vs. CZ 455 American
« Reply #17 on: March 05, 2011, 07:21:26 PM »
HotRod9mm, can you tell me who makes those Weaver rails you've got on your CZs and where you got them? They look really nice.
I think he makes them himself:
http://www.diproductsinc.com/Products.aspx?CAT=3600
_______________________________________
I have nothing interesting to put in my signature.

Offline Plink

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 87
  • NRA Smallbore Metallic Silhouette - Southern, WI
Re: CZ 452 American vs. CZ 455 American
« Reply #18 on: February 23, 2012, 08:52:51 PM »
My personal thought would be both would be excellent for hunting purposes.  For .22LR target shooting, I would pick the 452 as my preference. 
www.beloitrifleclub.org
CZ 452, Amer,  LH, .22LR
Sightron 6-24X42SIL w  BKL Rings

Offline JSC_Liason_Neo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: CZ 452 American vs. CZ 455 American
« Reply #19 on: September 24, 2015, 03:31:45 AM »
how about the 452 and 452 2e, are there any differences?