Every one knows the AR is the best rifle ever made and nothing will ever be better - not even worth looking at anything new - ever. This can be read across the Internet. This kind of thought came to prominence during the time of the assault weapon ban when it was difficult to get foreign stuff imported.
I spent 10 years yearning to drink from another cup, knowing there was a lot more to drink than 100% pure AR koolade.
Now I have 8 AR?s, they sit in the safe, must have an inch of dust on them now, will have to dust them later - but waiting for the dust to accumulate to 2? first. For me, and I speak only for myself, AR?s are boring and there is nothing imaginative about them any more.
So when I think about the Bren, am I thinking there are lots of ways to skin a cat - how did this arms maker do it and why did they do it the way they did? What did they change from the 805 and why? I have similar thoughts each time I look at IWI, FN, Beretta and B&T - different minds - fine minds - different solutions.
I love the technology and evolution of firearms especially military types. I appreciate that CZ brought Bren 2 to us and I understand why they put the AR type adapter on it. However, it would have been better to do something else besides the AR thing but that was their choice, fine.
My choice was to make mine less AR-ish and wait for Bren 2 stocks and SBR it as compliance parts come to market. Yes, I?d like mine to look as much like the vision CZ had for this pistol/rifle.
Adding AR stuff is not for me but if someone else wants to AR the Bren 2 platform up to bring it closer to ?AR Perfection? then I say God bless them,it is their weapon. But each time I see a non-AR with an AR stock I avert my eyes.
I bought my 4th CZ, I want a Bren 2 stock on it and if some one made a DI kit for a Bren 2 to move closer to ?perfection? Is no soone do that than add an AR brace/stock.
Again, bless those that have a different idea, really, I just want mine as close to how it envisioned by its creators.
