I'd like to thank those forum members who offered positive solutions to my problem, and I'd like to address a few of your comments regarding my technique. Regarding cleaning cases: I've cleaned a few thousand rifle cases wet tumbling with SS pins, and vigorously tumble them in 3 or 4 fresh water rinses. I have found pins in the flash holes of a few cases, like I did with the 9mm case mentioned in one of my last threads. No agitation process would have dislodged these pins as they were removed with needle nose pliers. I'm anal about clean cases, clean primer pockets, albeit not necessary when loading handgun ammo, just the way I am. Cases are decapped, cleaned, dried. Water contamination of the primers is not an issue.
I can
fully appreciate that you believe your process is very, very good. And I can see from your posts and especially from this last response that you take a lot of pride in your work. So with that footnote, let me simply critique
one of the many processes that's been detailed for us.
Case Cleaning1) Vigorously tumble them during 3 or 4 rinses ? Don't you think that the presence of water might slow their ability of the media to react, and thereby act to keep the media in place ? If you are trying to dislodge something that you absolutely and positively
DO NOT want to remain a part of a second body then common sense would dictate that this action be done in air. This because air is a thinner medium, and allows the part that you are trying to dislodge to react quicker.
2) The average flash hole is 0.060 to 0.062" in diameter. If you are having to pull stainless media from you flash holes with pliers, then your media is
WAY over-sized. In fact it should be no larger in diameter than 0.035". I suggest you order a box of the
Frankfort Arsenal SST media and give that a try.
Frankly, I've never heard of SST media for firearms brass of the diameter range that you describe. I'm sure they make
industrial tumbling media that big for use on larger parts such as gears, but NOT for cartridge cases. (Or, better yet, stop all use of any and all media, because the chemicals are doing most of the work anyway.)
3) "No agitation process would have dislodged these pins", well here I have to point out that of all the 100,000 reloaders using wet tumbling, your's is the only report of extreme issues. Simply from a statistical standpoint lets consider 100,000 people with zero issues and 1 with issues. If we give you the benefit of the doubt and say 10% of those are doing it wrong, the factors are still 90,000 to 1. So just on the face of it, we
might want to consider who is right and who might possibly need improvement.
Believe me, I don't want to start a war over this. I simply want to point out that the "best laid plans of mice and men oft go astray". It has been that way since time began. The wonderful thing about a real "community" is that you can experiment with ideas, and you will often find (
as I have on multiple occasions) that your best ideas simply don't stand up to the light of thoughtful examination. As a design engineer, I can tell you that if 3 of every 10 of your ideas pan out, you can be a real hero !! To put it another way, the lifetime batting average of the greatest baseball player
EVER is only 366. (And they've been playing baseball now for 100 years.) Meaning Ty Cobb only got a hit about 1/3 of the time !!
So I urge you to re-examine your processes, which are "tried", but not so "true". We truly respect that you are "going down swinging", but you are possibly standing too close to the problem. The community here is really trying hard to help you.
All the best.