Hi,
With all the stuff they're discontinuing they'll probably discontinue the company next. If Colt is so bad why did they buy Colt? Maybe it says something about the intelligence of CZ management.
Something greater than 50%, perhaps 60%, of CZ's sales were w/in the US pre-merger. Even greater post-Colt now as "Colt CZ Group" adds Colt's revenues... As far as I can tell, the reasons for purchasing Colt were 1) brand recognition, 2) to open the door to more military and police contracts for CZ firearms in the US/North America and Europe (having physical toe-hold in both locations), and 3) it's the standard B-school/MBA grad strategy of growth-at-all costs, which for Colt-CZ group means acquiring huge debts in an extremely aggressive M&A (merger and acquisitions) strategy to max short-term quarterly
paper profits irrespective of potential for long-term harms, including viability, of the business...
There's another thread here that's thoroughly hashed out the merger. And #2 is ironic considering that CZ-USA has pretty much killed their Mil/LE program that was hugely popular with those communities, including FFLs with current/prior service.
And yes, if not clear, there are several huge gambles by CZ's management here that could jeopardize the future of the company long-term as well as all the other brands they're acquiring. Spuhr being the latest AFAIK.