Poll

Would you be interested in buying a Combat II if they were available?

Hell Yeah!
20 (87%)
Nope, who cares, there's two Shadow variants already...
3 (13%)

Total Members Voted: 23

Voting closed: December 14, 2012, 12:59:24 PM

Author Topic: Why no Combat II..?  (Read 4629 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gunnie 18

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 44
Re: Why no Combat II..?
« Reply #15 on: January 13, 2012, 01:00:46 AM »
i would take one...!

Angus - please bring back the SP07?s too......!

th3ug1y0n3

  • Guest
Re: Why no Combat II..?
« Reply #16 on: January 13, 2012, 01:16:13 AM »
i would take one...!

Angus - please bring back the SP07?s too......!

Now you are really stating something I would want a Combat II but not sure if I would buy right away.  However...I want and would buy the SP07 right away.

Offline angus hobdell

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2280
    • CZ Custom
Re: Why no Combat II..?
« Reply #17 on: January 13, 2012, 07:33:53 PM »
So we made 4 ONLY!
Had to stop there but we went all the way, So these are a commemorative Edition of the World Shoot Ecuador SP0 done in CZ Custom Style
(Basically a SP01 Shadow Custom with a  shorter Frame And Slide.) All the work done ready for you use :-)
$1300.00 Plus Shipping
Item Code 91717

http://i1100.photobucket.com/albums/g415/AngusHobdell/CZ-SHADOW-COMBAT-II_2.jpg
http://i1100.photobucket.com/albums/g415/AngusHobdell/CZ-SHADOW-COMBAT-II_3.jpg
Angus Duhhhh!

Offline Stuart

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8592
Re: Why no Combat II..?
« Reply #18 on: January 13, 2012, 08:03:32 PM »
That looks freaking awesome...wish I had $1300 check to write you.

Offline N.D.

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 27
Re: Why no Combat II..?
« Reply #19 on: May 20, 2012, 03:06:24 PM »
The more Shadow varietals the better, especially if they offer more Calibers and BBL length options, shorter trigger reach  AKA .357 Sig., .40 S&W, 400 Corbon, SD/ .40 Super W/ a 7-9" BBL *for Hunting*
« Last Edit: May 20, 2012, 03:27:36 PM by N.D. »