Which leads to me to ask the same question I have all along: why did anyone care about the R51? It never seemed to have ANY promise in my mind. I got to hold a pre-release model and it just seemed terrible...I honestly cannot name another gun that screams 'I am shoddily built' at such a volume.
I feel bad for the people who bought one of these, only to (apparently) get shafted. At least other manufacturers that commonly have teething issues on new models (looking at you, Sig) generally get them worked out. But I really don't get why anyone put any confidence in Remington or this gun to begin with.
henehcuhp, I appreciate your advice on pistols to buy. I have shot a few of those mentioned and they would do the job they were intended to do.
I can only speak for myself. First, I carry a 9mm Sig 239 and like it. Why I like it: It also does what it was intended to do very well. It also isn't painful to shoot 50 or 100 S.D. rds. It also will shoot to 25 yards accurately. I competed with it in the 1990's because it's "fun" to shoot. In all this time not one single malfunction has ever occurred with a multitude of different ammo. It also offers 8+1 and a 10+1 options that I have for carry/home defense or just fun at the range or in competition as a 'bug'..
As far as your recurring question---
why?
1. I was willing to take a chance because I like the original design principles. It's actually simple and eliminates unneeded space in the frame. The lower bore axis made it pleasant to shoot any number of SD rds.
2. For me, it pointed great, felt light, was slim and carried easily IWB.
3. The action did all it was designed to do. It shot very fast and accurately, and recoil was not a factor at all with strong loads. With decent machining and QC, I could outshoot my P239 and smile.
The problem: I wasn't as smart as you are. I had some degree of faith in Remington from long ago shotgun experiences. I gambled and lost.
Too amplify MY Problem,
I still think it's an excellent design for 9mm. I'm also old enough that I can't afford to wait a few years to verify new pistol reliablity.
By some fluke, a few on another forum just love their R-51s, that are said to not have any of the problems the large majority of us experienced.
[Cracked mags, ill-fitting trigger pins, over-all internal poor machining, irregular dovetail cuts/loose sights, FTFeed due to irregular chamber machining,-firing out of battery due to the same, problems fully engaging the grip safety ]
P.S. I emailed Remington yesterday. I asked for a complete refund if the NEW FUNCTIONAL R-51 pistol I was scheduled to recieve this week couldn't be delivered as promised.