I know, I know, we have a sub forum for this pistol that is tucked away, forgotten in the Curio and Relic CZ Section, which is practically dead concerning the CZ it seems most everyone wants to forget about. There has got to be somebody active on this board who still has one of these besides member "ac".
Those who've read my posts know I'm an oddball, as I prefer shooting my CZ's in DA and I like true, self-cocking, revolver-style DAO models of certain pistols; namely ones I owned in the past such as the Beretta 96D and Ruger P95DAO, and now I have a Beretta Cougar 8000D on the way. Possibly later on a PX4 D and Sig P250 may eventually join the collection, which is presently undergoing a major overhaul.
The old CZ 100 looks like a dream come true for me since I doubt I'll ever see a DAO P-01 and/or P-07. Roughly identical in size to the two aforementioned models and a slim profile for CC'ing, with exception of the sharp edges.
Those who speak from experience actually handling, shooting, and owning the 100, please tell the blunt, honest truth. Is the trigger truly as bad as the reports and reviews make/made it out to be? It seems that for every one or two shooters that like them, there are 10 to 15 that just rip the pistol apart, and all because of the trigger.
I'm just having a very difficult time trying to wrap my head around how bad it can be, especially if it is a 10-pound pull as the specs list from the September '98 issue of American Rifleman I was able to track down.
Yes, even they mention that it is a long pull. But when I'm looking at a side angle shot, the trigger looks like it is in the same forward position as any other DA/DAO pistol. More specifically, concerning length from start position to where the trigger would meet it's farthest rearmost position all the way back.
