Problems w/ the Bren
Quick summary as I read it:
1. Non-adjustable stock length
2. Doesn't use Stanag Mags
3. Mags fall out/come loose when shooting
4. Mags don't fit their web gear and aren't compatible with off the shelf options -- mags actually larger than VZ58 mags
5. Slings don't stretch/have a bungee component (I think, not sure on this one)
6. Supplied optics fail after not a lot of shots
7. The gun jams
Other notes (? mark indicates not certain):
-Lack of detailed operating/disassembly/maintenance instructions?
-Problems chambering rounds -- chews up brass and bullet when feeding and sometimes jams
-Bayonet doesn't fit
-Now way to hold the weapon when stock folded and shoot accurately?
-Large mags, not stanag mags, why the size difference when 5.56 cartridges smaller (all again); -- my addition: mags are also reportedly heavier (at least empty) than VZ58 mags
-Polymer in weapon causes it to move/flex substantially when firing making irons sights almost unuseable (or possibly in relation to the charging handle in eyesight causing distraction/flinching?)
-Sharp edges on weapon (presumably rails) tears gloves and fingers if not gloves...
-Bipod is either unnecessary or unuseable -- something about monopoding on magazine being better?
-Iron shavings fly from the weapon during shooting causing shooters to always wear googles/be concerned about their eyes (presumably something with the internal rail/bolt/etc interfaces)?
-Difficulty with making the weapon safe -- something about either no clearing or not always igniting rounds, not sure which?
-Primarily an issue of extraction/stuck cases in chamber with brass being torn by extractor, possibly something else about recoil?
Google translate of gunexpert.cz:
http://www.gunexpert.cz/news/ohrozuje-nespolehliva-cz-805-zivoty-nasich-vojaku/Threatens unreliable CZ 805 lives of our soldiers?
05/01/2012 19:31
http://www.novinky.cz/domaci/266331-cesti-vojaci-bojuji-i-se-svou-vyzbroji-jejich-nove-pusky-bren-selhavaji.html
Multiplying complaints about the unreliability of the CZ 805 is probably a really saying about this article. Judging unilaterally is very unprofessional, so I will try to summarize what I know about the issue. The above article can unload yourself how you want 805ka certainly is not yet free from all childhood diseases, but if it was really wreck in Afghanistan would never let her. That weapon in harsh combat conditions sek?e becomes equally Glock, M4, or 805ce Sa vz 58. It is true, however, that failed to pades?tosmi?ka, it really must be ... luckily I have the opportunity to occasionally talk to the boys who were with 805kou serving in Afghanistan and am I supposed first-hand information. The facts are this:
1. A lot of problems can the army itself, since nenaspecifikovala exactly what he needs. This applies, although butt-folding, but this can be expendable. Soldiers need an adjustable length. And this is not to Bren.
Second Incompatible tray with NATO z?sobnn?ky to M4. The big problem. However, if you have information - again-army nenaspecifikovala. Zbrojovka it supposedly can do.
3. Tray fall during the shooting of the shaft. Apparently this is happening. I do not know, I've never seen. I've been testing for durability tests in Brod, I vybouchal few trays, nothing like that happened to me. But if it's really true - I can only pray behind boys. And I suggest you do too.
4. Hopper do not fit into any of the vest or sea squirts. They are simply larger than Sa 58. This is actually quite a problem I think. Rather it but see it as salts for one of the suppliers of equipment.
Fifth bearing belts weapons prevent stretching. Hm, it would probably be quite bothered me.
6th optics due to poor solutions leverage mount assembly after n?kalika dozens of shots from the gun falls. I've heard from several people about something to it.
7th I heard something about sticking ...
Because our site reads a lot of kids serving in Afghanistan, we give here a space for discussion, info first hand is closer to me than any censored advertising drivel.
Let me cite a few contributions of users from one discussion, what drove to the article army.cz. They are the soldiers who serve with the qv?ry ... Sadly reading
72. mp member P??slavice:
, "That is nice to supplement operating instructions, though I've never met anyone jaho same with us, even though these weapons have"
"We are of the gun to shoot first time in about 14 days before the first firing, thus completely new weapons without interference soldiers, ammunition Czech SB, problems of feeding into the chamber, when the ejection charge that did not go into the chamber bruises on one side of the cartridge, so hard bad service, our similarly-pr?zkum?ci have those weapons for about 2 months and doted cool and suddenly these shootings same problems as Plum bring the weapons biting even when shooting a training ammunition when the shooter had a gun propped tank on the ground. ... .. we only use what we got and I am glad that I have this thing out in afgo?i because she did not believe it, at least not yet ... "
43. The members of the VMP Chrudim:
"While we are so amazingly tech weapons, so at someone show me how to put the rifle bayonet ... ... or how it is when folded butt decently fire when there is no place to put the hand"
"Why is the super modern weapons so big stack when it is smaller caliber than the SA58? Why it is not on the M4 magazine well? Where container was smaller why is it so hard? Why is everything relaxes while shooting a soldier It has all the time to check and fear that made him drop the mechanical sights ?? why I have all the time torn gloves on sharp edges? do not go round? Why when I try to handset submachine gun with bipod and I stack up in arms is the bipod totally unnecessary? why of the flying iron shavings and soldiers have to worry about your eyes? "
"N?koalika after shots blanks, I reached the conclusion I carried weapons security, I peered down the barrel and stayed there a charge, I did so three times a bouncer caught a second time to the charge, which was inserted in the barrel ... so where's the problem?"
"After less than a hundred blows from CZ805Bren I enable mechanical sights to which I had nessahal, where is the problem?"
"I am not an expert, just a normal user ... ... standard size of the charge is the maximum weight may vary missiles or dust composition. But it does not affect those defects which are Bren. It may tear or rip the cartridge bottom, but the new charge forced the conclusion to vyst?elen?ho in the chamber is not a defect ammo! A plastics do not fall off of the stock due to ammunition. Like stiff conclusion is not the fault of ammunition. "
V?ce zde: http://www.gunexpert.cz/news/ohrozuje-nespolehliva-cz-805-zivoty-nasich-vojaku/