Very nice thread. To whomever asked about whether the Hornady feeder is worth buying of if blue paint would make it better....
I broke down and ordered the red one on a black Friday deal and have already run about 3000 rounds thru it.
I own a 2-speed Blue model and they are much the same. 100-150 cases is about optimal. (You have to stop and load primers anyway.) There is an occasional snag at the top when cases don't drop fast enough. (The latest Blue model is variable speed, and this might help solve this.) And of course, the last 3 cases can take forever to fall. But that's simply due to the cases randomly landing heavy-end down in the rotating plate.
The biggest difference between Red and Blue case feeders is not in the physical case feeder, but how the machines handle the case between the feed tube and the shell plate. That 2.5" journey makes all the difference.
Wobbly is right, I only have issue with the design on the pivot assembly.
My issues with the Hornady case feeder system is the pivot block design. The case feeder up top has worked well. The shuttle system that pushes the case into the shell plate is also sound. Keep tabs on the pivot block assembly and when it starts to gall/wear on the pivot body bracket, you are going to start seeing the push rod start popping out the push rod bushing (mine is epoxied in place now). That is the sign that there is rotational resistance to the pivot and this will ultimately cause the system to fail.
My analysis of the design flaws are that there isn't enough bearing surface (on the bolt that holds the pivot block on the pivot body bracket) to resist the pivot body tilting when the push rod actuates it. This allows the pivot to rub on the pivot body bracket on the opposite side from the push rod. Once there is wear on those surfaces (this takes time from use) the rotational resistance increases and causes the pivot to bind. Then the whole assembly flexes upward instead of pivoting and dropping a case. The cheap pot metal also contributes to this failure as it is super soft. The torsion spring is unnecessary as an extension spring is more than adequate. In addition, the angle on the pivot block is not steep enough and once there is rotational resistance, it aggravates the binding problem.
Pivot body and block wear:
My solution eliminates all of these design issues. The thrust bearing is overkill but makes it run very smooth. You could probably just get away with raising the pivot block off the pivot body bracket (by cutting a relief opposite the push rod or just using a washer) and changing to a steeper actuation angle.
Cheers,
Toby