I only offered the 'physics' explanation because some readers seemed confused or in denial. Its common sense - the mainspring affects slide velocity just like the recoil spring does. That is why SOME shooters put in heavier recoil springs to compensate when they change out mainsprings. I never claimed it would hurt the gun of most shooters, and as I pointed out, gamers don't care - they are going for max shoot-ability, and have sponsors, etc. - heck - the cost of ammo alone is more than a regular shooter could stand.
And, I ask you why the hammer spring and its effect is fundamentally different than the recoil spring? (Speed does not cancel out the laws of physics). Both have a real effect on slide velocity. Cock the hammer on a Browning HP - it takes much force. I can tell you the difference. The hammer spring is compressed by the slide through a fulcrum - lever arm. When you cock it by hand - you apply force at the max fulcum - the top of the hammer. But when the slide hits it on recoil, it hits it at a much lower point, requiring a greater force - this force (supplied by the hammer spring) indeed affects slide velocity. More force means less slide velocity.
Going from 20 to 13 LBS is a BIG difference in the mainspring. Yes, the DA pull is much less, but the slide velocity is much greater.
One thing though. The P07 series is different and the SS doesn't perform the same function - which MAY make the gun more durable - but that is another thread.
Back to the OP. A CZ should not exhibit that description of your problem, and first thing is to get it right. In my case, CZ USA was a big help.