The second (my personal choice) is to remove the firing pin block mechanisms.
Doing so makes the trigger take up extremely smooth (like pulling on air), BUT will probably void the warranty (if you are into those things), have a possible accidental discharge if the gun is dropped (but firing pin blocks are a new thing. Many guns, until recently never had one), and after removing the block mechanisms, you might not be able to put it back, it is pretty tricky.
As I said, I chose option 2, but my risk threshold is very high.
I can't let this go, even though the post quoted above is five years old. A striker pistol is not like a hammer gun.
There are now several aftermarket strikers available, some of which might be too aggressive for even range use without the striker safety left in place. All one has to do to experience this is to release the slide lock and have the the slide slam closed normally and have the gun go off unexpectedly. Happened to me at the range with other people around, when shooting a modified P-10S several years ago. Fortunately, the gun was aimed down range. But I knew what happened--I had removed the striker safety mechanism while testing an aftermarket aluminum striker holder assembly and a modified striker slid off the trigger bar on impact of the slide. Scared me pretty bad. I unloaded the gun, cased it up and went home.
When I got home, I put the striker safety mechanism and CZ striker holder back in the pistol, along with a reliable service pistol CGW aftermarket striker, and haven't looked back since. No more ADs.
My advice--lightly polish the contact points between the striker safety mechanism and the trigger bar, but leave it in place, and adapt to the trigger pull.
Do not remove the striker safety. This is even more important if one uses any aftermarket striker, even those designed for duty rather than competition in my opinion. But an aggressive aftermarket striker, or worse, a "hobbyist modified" striker without a striker safety is simply too dangerous for any use.
Rant over.
Joe L