... It really shows that the Mantis X system doesn't record accuracy, but precision.
Exactly. It doesn't know how well you were able to aim the gun before the shot was released. From a rest, where the aim point accuracy is maximum, when I have a bad shot, it is always because I move the gun slightly as I pulled the trigger, and that shows up in the MantisX score. Standing, single hand, the correlation between MantisX scores and 8 ring hits versus 10 ring hits is not as good, because the gun is constantly wobbling, even with a perfect trigger pull, but the correlation between 6 ring hits and low MantisX scores is still good! I don't aim THAT badly, ever.
To give an example. Before I polished the trigger parts and installed the CGW trigger in my P-10S, my scores in dry fire two handed, unsupported, were low 90's. After the trigger work, I started seeing a lot more very high 90's and fewer below 95. Just a little more practice and nearly all of my dry fire scores were above 95. At the range, in live fire, from a rest, the scores held high 90's. It was the first time I remember seeing consistent high 90's in live fire, but I don't have a lot of history to compare.
Bottom line for me is that the dry fire practice at home with the MantisX helped me a bunch in reducing the number of shots it took for me to get good results live fire at the range, at least from a rest at 100 yards, which isn't a normal yard stick, I know, except for me.
Joe