Author Topic: Have you Commented on the ATF proposed change of firearm definition? Please Do!!  (Read 3455 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline tripingram

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 26
The ATF is over reaching again.  Pease give a RESPECTFUL comment on the issue, no copying. They throw out copies and disrespectful comments.
https://www.regulations.gov/document/ATF-2021-0001-0001

Offline armoredman

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19901
Make good, solid professional comments with no profanity or other harsh language, like posting here. We have a limited window, and even though we THINK it's pointless, it really isn't.

Offline NeedCZ

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 151
....also don't just cut and paste an existing letter that you got from a pro 2A group.  Original comments count more (even if imperfectly written) than multiple copies of the same comment

Offline Screwball

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Did both this and the brace one when they first came up…

Receiver one is at 93k, brace is at 121k. Hope they continue to get more submissions.

Offline armoredman

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19901
Time is running out - I think tomorrow is the last day.

Offline sevt_chevelle

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 280
What are some of points you guys are bringing?

Offline armoredman

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19901
One I used is the effect on hobbyists who won't know they are going to be instant criminals and that ATFE cannot make new law - that is the bailiwick of Congress, and the language of GCA 68 and NFA 34 has been set for quite a while.

Offline El Perdido

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 61
I have commented on the brace issues and this current open comment period.

Offline armoredman

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19901
The comment period is closed. Now we wait.