Thanks, everyone, for the comments. While I'm not the OP, I still like reading the ongoing discussion.
And for those who suggest not to, I want to bring you my perspective. The first handgun I had ever bought was a 1911. I would like to continue running that if it weren't so expensive to shoot. It may make some of you nauseous, but I'd rock a gov length slide on an officer's height frame if I could. I like the standard length slide on a shorter frame. It may not look super pretty, but it would be the most effective set-up for me. That said, the CZ P-07/P-09 is shooting 9mm, cheaper than 45, and I need that change. Also, I still like the 1911 SAO w/ manual safety and the simplicity of the design. And like a 1911, the omega system doesn't take an armorer to work on. So, considering everything, of all the firearms to chop, why not a P-07/P-09? I don't want to move to a striker-fired action handgun. No interest. I'm also not interested in any micro pistols either. I've looked at the new S&W CSX. But if I use a P-10S mag on a P-07, the height of my P-07 is now nearly the same as a S&W CSX. You could say my chopped P-07 is a P-07S aiming for that subcompact size. So why would I get a super short barrel with the same amount of height? I just don't want my grip hanging out during the summer months. So truly, after making the chop, the grip is perfect for my application. Lastly, I can have a 19-round (P-09/P-10F) mag as a backup, so I'm loaded. Again, I don't see any downside to performing this chop as it serves my needs.
It does indeed have to be done correctly for it to work out. But as long as all measurements are triple verified before making cuts/drills, it's fine. On another note, if they sold a P-07S (P-05?), I'd have already bought one.
Again, I respect everyone's opinion. I'm just giving you mine.
jertex:
I must say I do enjoy tinkering with firearms. So, I guess that's a part of it too. I was very concerned about destroying the P-07, so I put the idea on ice for so long. And as you may have noticed in the discussion, I looked at the engineering between a CZ-75 and RAMI to find out what was different and what wasn't. But the more I discovered that a good number of the RAMI fire control group parts were interchangeable with CZ-75s, I believed this was doable. Thanks for the comment!
Also, inthevalley:
Thanks for the compliment. I ended up getting an 18-pound recoil spring from CGW. I did the hammer spring math and am confident with where it's at. I don't want to mess with the hammer spring anymore because I don't want any light primer strikes. And I want to mention again that this hammer spring is longer than a RAMI hammer spring. If the same hammer springs are used between the CZ-75s, P-07/P-09s, and RAMIs (which are the same but just cut), I know I'm not truly messing with any of the engineering. And after the updated recoil spring, the cartridges land 6 feet away without any lock-back issues. I'm thoroughly enjoying this pistol.
As for the DA pull... I cannot comment. I primarily use the manual safety, so I haven't noticed a difference. I did some very light polishing on the hammer strut so DA it would feel smoother. Therefore, I can't tell the difference when considering just the chop alone. All I have to say is I like it, and it hasn't seemed to have changed too much.
Please post if anyone else has any suggestions, opinions, or ideas!
I really enjoy competing ideas.
Thanks again!
z0mbi3