The following issue was brought up on a State firearms related site that I frequent:
I got into a 'theory' discussion with a family member, and the topic of constitutional rights came up. We both were wondering if a felon has done his/her time, why are only _some_ of their constitutional rights restored? For example, free speech seems to be restored, but RKBA is not (or is it? Doesn't _seem_ to be so). In any event, why would the 2nd NOT be restored (politically incorrect as it may sound)? If the 'rights' are selectively restored, shouldn't rights be an all or nothing proposition, if the system deems someone has done their time?
What are your thoughts on this?