The K frames and L frames are nice. But the M27 and M29 (N-frames) are just so smooth nothing else comes close.
I need to take pictures of my over 30 year old S&W and Ruger revolvers. I only keep one loaded and in the house these days. My Ruger Speed Six stainless with the 2&3/4" barrel and bobbed hammer. The rest are unloaded/in the safe.
I need to get the kids together for a revolver day at the range one nice day this winter. Just leave the semi-autos home and take the magnums to the range. Oh, forgot about that big stainless Dan Wesson .44, but then it's just not as smooth as the S&W's. Accurate, but not refined/elegant.
Not much out there as mean as a .357 magnum with the right ammo. The talk about "adequate penetration" and spend all kinds of money trying to make bullets do that today. Forty years ago the .357 magnum was doing it. I remember reading an after action report of a State Trooper involved shooting up in New England. He shot an armed man waiting to ambush him from inside the car he'd just stopped. The bullet went through the passenger side window, entered the right arm, traversed through the chest cavity, the left arm, through the interior door panel and steel of the drivers side door and raised up a big pimple on the outside of the driver's side door. The guy rolled out of the car and was found lying by the rear tire. One shot and the bad guy was down and done. A few years later when the "wonder 9's" were replacing the .357's an FBI officer shot a bad guy in Miami twice and both hollow points stopped short of the heart after passing through the left arm (without having passed through a car window first).
I'll admit, during that time I preferred carrying my 1911 until the Chief forced us all to go to 686's.
That's why I keep getting the urge to get a "good" .357 SIG. Sixteen shots instead of six. I've got two .357 SIGs now, but I wouldn't call either of them "good", in the sense of CZ good anyway.