Before saying anything I want to make clear I believe a great trigger is just one part of a gun?s accuracy and overall performance. I?d rather have good sights and er foes with a decent trigger on a gun than the best trigger with not very good sights/Ergos
I finally was able to shoot a P10c. It was a friends, used (bought in December) P10c and I was a bit let down by, you guessed it, the trigger. The trigger was not comparable to a brand new PPQ let alone either of my used ones. The P10c I shot had some grit in the take up, a heavier break, a longer reset, and the pinching OP complains of. It was nowhere as good as any of the 3 out-of-the-box PPQs and the Canik TP9SF I?ve owned. My canik has a nicer trigger, hands down, and I paid 339 for it. I liked the sights, texture, ergos and lack of muzzle flip on the P10c. And it was accurate enough at 15y for defense use. It?s offhand groups rivaled the Canik but not the 4? PPQ with a couple thousand rounds and definitely not the 5? with several thousand through it. The P10c trigger is good-better than most $499 compacts but I was let down as I?d been reading all the great things and how the trigger was incredible for the last year, how it would overtake the striker fired pistol scene. I expected a PPQ reset with smooth takeup that didn?t seem to want to travel into the grip to fire. If I buy one I would put in the trigger system CGW is developing and probably the steel guide rod along with the CZC gold front night sight with a small dot rrear night sight. I?m a CZ fan and the only guns I own that have all stock components are my Canik, my P99 and 45 Shield(edc since the day I first shot it and bought it) if I?m not mistaken. The other thing I noticed is the P10c was large for an iwb CC gun. Larger than my Glock 19 and even a little bigger than the 4?PPQ. 1/10? of a difference height or grip width matters to me.
I have a Phantom,it?s Cajunized via the defensive carry package and ezd sights and I love it. Best shooting pistol I have. I wish they made a compact for carry although the p07 is somewhat similar. Also,have a CZ75b with the same setup only night sights from CGW and love it almost as much. I want a compact CZ.
I?m still thinking about buying a P10c and dropping in a trigger and maybe sights. OTOH I may buy the more proven P07 (or a steel/alloy compact like a PCR or p01) instead. I had a p07 and traded it a couple years ago. An obvious mistake as I remember very little of it. I don?t kmow which Compact CZ I can make sing the best and do so using the least $ It would serve as a carry and range/steel challenge fun gun.
Tbh I was most surprised with the M&P 2.0 9mm than anything i shot Monday. It was near new, has better stippling and ergos and sights than the P10c IMO and is smaller-enough to matter for carry. I do carry a bone stock 45 shield so maybe I?m biased but the trigger has very little takeup, a clean 5lb break with no over travel and an okay reset. IME the trigger gets much better and lightens up nicely with just 300rds or so. 75 for an apex action kit or 150 for the kit and fwd set flat trigger might be worth it. Bone stock it was nearly as accurate as my 4? PPQ. The 45 shield I have is a tack driver out to 25y and the 9mm 2.0 proved to be the same. It would make sense to get one if I want to stay with the same manual od arms... however i have no doubt I?d end up putting an apex trigger and tfx sights on, woule likely carry over to my Shield.
Sorry for the novel. I agree with op to an extent but no one gun fits all.