I'm getting rid of my PT111 G2 to fund my purchase, and because I hate the trigger on it. The mile long takeup just doesn't work for me, so a PT709 isn't really an option.
Aaawww! Too bad! I really love mine, but I do know that the older PT111's had way better triggers, which is why I'm keeping mine. I easily qualified for my CCP with it.
![](http://www.hunt101.com/data/549/medium/PT111_PT709.jpg)
Size Comparison of Taurus PT111 to Taurus PT709. Both in 9mm
That said, I would recommend the Walther PPS M2, if you can afford one. Guns & Ammo did an extensive test of many sub-compact 9mm single stacks and you can read about it here.
http://www.gunsandammo.com/handguns/compacts/single-stack-9mm-shootout/
FIVE years later., what was your decision?...since the OP's original posting, the marketplace for 9mm's has exploded with the micro-9's, single stacks, double stacks and who knows what else is coming. As for me, I have since added Springfield's XD-Mod 2 Sub compacts in 40S&W and 45ACP, Taurus G3C, S&W 469, S&W Shield's in 40 and 45, Kahr PM9, K9 Elite '98 and CW45, plus a few more that don't come to mind.
I wanted a metal framed, subcompact 9mm and opted for the Kahr K9, a terrific gun but a single stack. I then got the Taurus G3C mainly for its higher capacity, again a terrific gun. No regrets on either, both are in the carry rotation.
BTW, I will say that my S&W Shields in any caliber are totally reliable. I don't think I ever experienced a failure to feed, fire and eject in any one. Love my Shields.