Why the anti-gunners will ultimately win

[SI VIS PACEM PARRABELLUM]

Politics is very tit for tat, with extremes on both sides profiting on the “we’ll back down when they do” mentality.

As an example, recently a couple cases came out of Alabama that impacted civil rights, one on race the other on women’s rights.  Both heralded by NRAtv.  The response in California was for the legislature to go into an extra session and come push through three new gun regulations/fees.

Regardless of how anyone feels about those cases, why even mention them on a gun rights advocacy network.

You got a link to what was supposedly said? What particular cases? What you are posting here is exceedingly vague and without substance without alot more info to back it up.

[Ruber]

While the site is not posting new videos, the archives are still up and readily accessible.

If you watched the videos, you saw them, if not, you can go back and watch them or use google.  Its not hard.

[recoilguy]

Really I watched and I must have a perspective different than you or I missed them.
If it is as easy as you profess please help me find them so I can be appalled as well.

RCG

[Ruber]

Really I watched and I must have a perspective different than you

Absolutely!  That’s kinda my point.

[recoilguy]

I know what your point is -
I just wish I could see it from the correct perspective like you do.

My point is : show me my folly, don't just say it exists but then expect me to be enlightened because you are.
you would have to be pretty silly to think I would dig hard to find what I don't see & you only say exists.

But I'm sure that's kinda your point again.

RCG

[Ruber]

Ok, here’s my point.

Don’t drag me down a rabbit hole if you are not going to look around yourself.

[recoilguy]

Ok here is my point:

don't tell me a rabbit hole exists ask me to look into it, but not show me where it is, not show me a rabbit actually lives there. And then get bent up when I say Ill go in but you need to show me its really a rabbit hole.

RCG

[Ruber]

The rabbit hole has been discussed ad nauseam, to ask for timestamps when Stinchfield or Bongino said something offensive is goofy and a diversion.  Ya I get that what they said does not offend you.  Again, that is not relevant to the discussion.

What I said was akin to asking folks to stop calling each other names.  Sorry that got you in a bind.

Now,,,, the real discussion point, is why does a gun advocacy group need to get into the weeds on non-firearms topics.



Ps.  I don’t mean to be a jerk, and in the last couple of months for NRAtv, they did change.  If you are really struggling to find off topic banter in their site, go back before May of this year.  If you are still struggling to find videos, pm me and I’ll send you some links.

[SI VIS PACEM PARRABELLUM]

I went in and found plenty but nothing where they disparage anyone. Or maybe it's just my right wing prism. Oh yeah there is a media matters vid in the mix with the rest that disparages NRATV and gun owners in general but what would anyone expect from the soros crowd?
You made allegations and you got in a bind when called out on them.The burden of proof is on you to validate your allegations.If you have links to something we aren't seeing post them for everyone to see.
I see gun discussions involving other topics quite often and they make valid points when you hear what's being said versus just the parts that maybe offend you.
When the left crams every perversity they can think down our throats as a constitutional right then turn around and call to abolish the 2A yeah it all becomes fair game. By the way if you're paying attention they're after the 1A as well with trying to ban words,phrases,and anything that might offend their new"woke" crowd like referring to a person's biological gender or the fact that a person is a convicted felon. The attack on our true constitutional rights spans more than just guns.

[Earl Keese]

 "The attack on our true constitutional rights spans more than just guns."
Very true, 2A is the lynchpin. If it falls, the rest follow quickly.

[Ruber]

offend their new"woke" crowd like referring to a person's biological gender

??

Enlighten me

[Old-Duckman]

offend their new"woke" crowd like referring to a person's biological gender

??

Enlighten me

How's this for a start (click the link below to see a simple "common sense" chart)...you must not follow any "news" other than the pablum, agenda driven "main stream media" propoganda. The agenda is no longer hidden and is forced down ours and our children's throats on a daily basis.
http://transstudent.org/pronouns101/

[Grendel]

Enough. There's a reason we restrict political discussion on this board to items that directly affect our right to keep and bear arms.

Locked.