So you post personal info which in this case are pics of your personal property and leave a taunt in your closing line under the pic and then complain it somehow violates your right to privacy? Please define your logic here. Surely this is a joke,right?
My father many years ago instilled in me the notion that sometimes it's best to keep quiet and not let people know certain things about you or items you possess. No one even law enforcement would know you have high cap mags if you didn't post them and do you think law enforcement couldn't find you even if this thread is removed? Do you not think le types monitor what is being said and posted? I think it best to remember that the only things that have true eternal life on earth are government programs and anything we post on the internet.
I automatically assume that the Feds have access to recordings of every phone call I've ever made and every email I've ever sent or received, and the A.I. processing power to winnow out anything firearm related. Just because we are now starting to see the applications of A.I. in our lives today, doesn't mean the government hasn't already had it for decades. In short, I assume they know of every candy bar I've ever purchased.
As a private citizen, they SHOULDN'T know anything about me, and as public servants, we should know everything about them. As we all know, the reality of the situation is backwards.
Short of cutting off all internet access and living in the hills like a bushman, I see no way to avoid Big Brother's oversight.
The current ruling on the magazine limitation rests on the argument that a magazine is not an "arm" but an accessory, and thus falls outside the purview of the second amendment. I expect the supreme court to rule (at minimum) that a magazine is an intrinsic part of a firearm, and as such, is beyond the jurisdiction of the state to regulate.
We shall see.
...and the other thing that "has eternal life" is 'temporary' government programs. Federal income tax being the most notable.
