foxfyre841 -- thanks for sharing.
Yes, it looks like the extended disconnector accomplishes the same effect as the tab, but it does on the disconnector side rather than the carrier. Interesting nonetheless. Haven't seen the ORF parts before, very cool.
The VZ58rifle.com part, I think due to the pivoting disconnector it functions similarly due to the pivoting upward portion of the disconnector -- increases the range/length of interaction between the carrier and disconnector just like the tab and the ORF disconnector do.
The Hermex effect is what the tab and the ORF part attempt to rectify, as does the VZ58rifle.com part as well.
The other issue mentioned by the VZ58 site is the side to side play that results in you sometimes needing to pull the trigger twice to release the striker when using the original trigger group and semi auto sear only -- e.g., the small sear in your photo not the wider one as utilized by bonesteel and century. Somewhere there's a video out of Canada of them using the base of a 22lr casing as a spacer on the sear pin to accomplish the same (looks like the VZ58rifle disconnector prohibits the sear from that lateral movement).
In full auto, both the left (from shooter perspective: narrower, semi auto) and right (wider, full auto) sears catch the striker in semi auto (due to full auto mechanism, the full auto striker releases automatically when bolt carrier is in batter, allowing the trigger pull to release the semi auto sear once pulled). Full auto, just the full auto catches the striker when the trigger is released. As the semi auto sear was never intended to arrest the striker on its own and is more delicate than the full auto sear, conceptually the semi auto sear is a potential failure point. Whether that is actually a problem, I don't know -- but something to be mindful of. Again, the bonesteel or Century trigger group with the wide sear should make this sear failure null and void.