Lots of folks don't like the short slide depth of the 75B, P-09, P-07 which results from slide in frame. Maybe CZ went to slide over frame to give a little more grip area like the other makers have? Obviously doesn't matter to me but it is a big deal to some people. I'm thinking the bore axis height can be the same with either rail design. The MAC video shooters exhibited very little rise and very short time back on target. There doesn't appear to be any problem with the bore axis to me, regardless of the actual dimensions.
I don't see anything but a well engineered striker fired gun from a company with a history of designing excellent firearms. Can't wait to shoot one. I don't think anyone around my neck of the woods has won a local bullseye match with a striker fired gun yet. Maybe this one is the one? May be a while before we know for sure.
Joe
What strikes me as odd is the parts on the table in the screenshot I posted earlier.
I've got a few different striker fired designs, and that doesn't look like any of them. Probably has something to do with the crisp trigger and short reset that they talked about in the video. Looks like it will also be receptive to a nice polish job! If you create a reliable striker fired pistol with a crisp trigger, you're going to win over a lot of shooters.
As much as I love my CZ's, all of my defensive pistols have a single consistent trigger pull and no manual safety. That's just my personal preference, but it's a preference that is shared by quite a few people. Not a bad market to get in considering the success others have had with designs that leave much to be desired in terms of ergonomics and reliability. Hopefully CZ can raise the bar with this pistol, but we'll have to wait and see.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
