Author Topic: SAR vs Canik quality?  (Read 29317 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline DF_Hammack

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 219
Re: SAR vs Canik quality?
« Reply #75 on: August 21, 2019, 03:51:34 PM »
I have a Tristar/Canik, P100, and a SAR B6P. The P100 is all steel, and is my EDC. Obviously, I trust my life to it. My B6P is my goto range gun. Obviously, it is a polymer frame gun. It functions flawlessly. With a couple thousand rounds through it I honestly can't remember a malfunction. I have even carried  my B6P in daily carry from time to time. Either gun is more accurate than I am. Neither gun is a beauty queen. They are well crafted, but not well dressed. Both of the guns have a serviceable, polycoat type of finish on the steel. They are just good running guns. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend either gun, to anyone.
« Last Edit: August 21, 2019, 03:57:12 PM by DF_Hammack »
Tristar P100 - SAR B6P

Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American - Congressman Tenche Coxe, 1788